![]() ![]() We can't work with large banks as our initial partners on the LDL as it would be too resource intensive for us. We must build the LDL to work with fintech startups. We don’t want to be a generic blockchain because our goals are significantly focused on finance. There is no existing blockchain that could provide what we require, that’s why we are building the LDL. We will be the largest decentralised application provider of the Liquid Ledger. This will show the performance of the platform for other fintech startups, and it will help the longevity of Liquid as well. ![]() We plan to migrate our entire exchange onto the LDL. One of our plans for the beginning of the LDL is for us to use it as a proof of concept. It’s important to us to ensure that the fintech community will embrace it and it will become the utility token for our independent, open source ledger - the Liquid Distributed Ledger (LDL). At the moment, if we go down, the Liquid token will not survive. This is why, in the future, I want to decouple the Liquid token from our company. The developer community can embrace these projects and keep them alive longer than a single founding entity. ![]() But not in the case of Bitcoin and Ethereum. With a lot of tokens, if the token issuer goes down, so does the token. What is great about Bitcoin, and also Ethereum, is their open source nature and developer community. I’m sure there are plenty of tokens that are going to deal with issues regarding whether they are a security of not. When I look at other cryptocurrencies, what I see is a lot of coins that are going to have issues in the future for one reason or another. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |